From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Milo v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 22, 2016
Case No. EDCV 14-2205 DOC(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 14-2205 DOC(JC)

07-22-2016

JESSIE DELACRUZ MILO, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied as time-barred, that this action is dismissed with prejudice, and that Judgment be entered accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Milo v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 22, 2016
Case No. EDCV 14-2205 DOC(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Milo v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE DELACRUZ MILO, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 14-2205 DOC(JC) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2016)