Opinion
10084-23
08-21-2023
ORDER AND DECISION
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge.
On August 18, 2023, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision. However, the proposed decision document improperly refers to the additions to tax determined in the Notice of Deficiency as "penalties." Consequently, the Court is unable to process the Proposed Stipulated Decision.
In view of the foregoing, to give effect to the agreement of the parties, and for cause, it is
ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision is recharacterized as the parties' Settlement Stipulation. Taking into account the basis for settlement reached between the parties, as reflected in that document, it is further
ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is no deficiency in income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, petitioner for the taxable year 2018;
That there is no addition to tax under I.R.C. section 6651(a)(1) due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018;
That there is no addition to tax under I.R.C. section 6651(a)(2) due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018; and
That there is no addition to tax under I.R.C. section 6654 due from petitioner for the taxable year 2018.