From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millus v. Milford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 2001
289 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2001-10991, 2001-06364

Submitted December 5, 2001.

December 31, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 19, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Kagan Gertel, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Irving Gertel of counsel), for appellants.

Norman Volk Associates, P.C., New York, N Y (Michael I. Josephs of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs submitted the examination before trial of the defendant Joseph N. Milford, wherein he stated that a school bus driven by the plaintiff Alande Millus hit the side of his vehicle while Milford was attempting to execute a right turn onto Christopher Street from the extreme left lane of Seventh Avenue South. Although it appears that Milford violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1160(a), the plaintiff driver failed to establish as a matter of law his freedom from comparative negligence (see, King v. Washburn, 273 A.D.2d 725).

Accordingly, summary judgment was properly denied.

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Millus v. Milford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 2001
289 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Millus v. Milford

Case Details

Full title:ALANDE MILLUS, ET AL., Appellants, v. JOSEPH N. MILFORD, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 202

Citing Cases

Valore v. McIntosh

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. This case involves a motor vehicle accident which occurred on…

Scibelli v. Hopchick

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. In support of his motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff…