From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
289 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6371.

Submitted: August 14, 2008.

Decided: August 19, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-03466-DKC).

Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Albert Curtis Mills seeks to appeal the district court's order placing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint on the unassigned docket in accordance with Mills' pre-filing injunction. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mills v. Warden, No. 8:07-cv-03466-DKC (D.Md. Jan. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Warden

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 19, 2008
289 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Mills v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:Albert Curtis MILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN, Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

289 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2008)