From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Unknown Franchisee

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 18, 2021
Civil Action 20-566 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-566

11-18-2021

JUSTYNA MILLS, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN FRANCHISEE And MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants.


Lisa Pupo Lenihan, Magistrate Judge.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge.

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On October 13, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 59) recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim filed by Unknown Franchisee, identified as Moody National SHS Pittsburgh MT, LLC, (Doc. 45), be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion should be granted as it relates to the issue of negligent interference with contract but denied in all other respects. Service of the R&R was made on the parties, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the R&R, the following Order is entered: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 45) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, in that Count II against Defendant Unknown Franchisee (Moody National SHS Pittsburgh MT, LLC) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the R&R is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Unknown Franchisee

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 18, 2021
Civil Action 20-566 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Mills v. Unknown Franchisee

Case Details

Full title:JUSTYNA MILLS, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN FRANCHISEE And MARRIOTT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 20-566 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2021)