From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ S-05-1291 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. Civ S-05-1291 GEB KJM P.

October 20, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By an order filed July 1, 2005, petitioner was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit within thirty days. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with the July 1 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Mills v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ S-05-1291 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH W. MILLS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

No. Civ S-05-1291 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)