From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK.

February 1, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders and rules;

3. All pending motions are denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH MILLS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)