From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 29, 1937
175 So. 699 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

7 Div. 295.

June 8, 1937. Rehearing Stricken June 29, 1937.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Clair County; Woodson J. Martin, Judge.

Willie Mills was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

W. T. Starnes, of Pell City, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Affirmed.

On Rehearing.


Rule 38 of the Supreme Court requires that all applications for rehearings must be filed with the clerk of the court, accompanied by brief for the appellant and a certificate by counsel that a copy of such brief has been delivered to opposing counsel within fifteen days after the rendition of the judgment, whether such period extends beyond the term of court or not. The rule further provides that no application shall be received or filed which is not presented in strict compliance with this rule.

The application for rehearing not having been filed in accordance with the foregoing rule, the application for rehearing is stricken. Williams v. State, ante, p. 525, 175 So. 697.

Application stricken.


Summaries of

Mills v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 29, 1937
175 So. 699 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Mills v. State

Case Details

Full title:MILLS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 29, 1937

Citations

175 So. 699 (Ala. Crim. App. 1937)
175 So. 699

Citing Cases

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Curtin

It must be filed in this court within the period stipulated. Bonner v. State, 31 Ala. App. 369, 17 So.2d 547;…