From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Reed

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Sep 7, 2021
5:21-cv-309-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

5:21-cv-309-WFJ-PRL

09-07-2021

CHRISTOPHER D. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. LT. SARAH REED and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff initiated this action on June 2, 2021 by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. 1). On July 13, 2021, Plaintiff was ordered to either submit the filing fee or complete and file an Affidavit of Indigency within twenty-one days of the Order. (Doc. 9). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or requested an extension of time in which to do so.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close this file.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Reed

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Sep 7, 2021
5:21-cv-309-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Mills v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER D. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. LT. SARAH REED and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

5:21-cv-309-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. Sep. 7, 2021)