Opinion
No. 20-1019 No. 20-1021
09-28-2020
LAWRENCE MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND STATE POLICE; OFFICER ANTHONY HASSAN, In both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Maryland State Police; OFFICER JAMES LANTZ, In both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Maryland State Police; OFFICER MATTHEW DULL, In both his official and individual capacity as an officer of the Maryland State Police, Defendants - Appellees.
Lawrence Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-00562-GLR) Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Mills appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and his postjudgment motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mills v. Maryland, No. 1:18-cv-00562-GLR (D. Md., Sept. 30, 2019; Dec. 23, 2019). We also deny Mills' motions for partial summary reversal and vacatur, and for initial hearing en banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED