From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK

01-19-2023

THOMAS K. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. I.Z. JONES, et al., Defendants.


GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S CONSTRUED MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(2)

(ECF NO. 159)

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's construed motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). (ECF No. 159; see also ECF No. 162). Plaintiff stated that he wishes to dismiss the entire action without prejudice. (ECF No. 159.) Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 163).

Rule 41(a)(2) states, in relevant part:

[A]n action may be dismissed at the plaintiff's request only by court order on terms the court considers proper . . . . Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph (2) is without prejudice.

Trial courts have broad discretion to grant motions for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2). See Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir. 1982). Here, there is no disagreement regarding the terms and conditions of the requested dismissal.

Accordingly, 1. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 159) is granted;

2. The matter is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate all pending motion and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 19, 2023
1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Mills v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS K. MILLS, Plaintiff, v. I.Z. JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 19, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2023)