From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mills v. Cuellar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01247-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01247-NONE-EPG (PC)

06-01-2021

JAKAN CHAMEL MILLS, Plaintiff, v. R. CUELLAR, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND CLOSE THE CASE (ECF No. 41)

On May 27, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees. (ECF No. 41). In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign a district judge to this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to CLOSE THIS CASE. However, the Court retains jurisdiction over the litigation to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mills v. Cuellar

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
1:20-cv-01247-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Mills v. Cuellar

Case Details

Full title:JAKAN CHAMEL MILLS, Plaintiff, v. R. CUELLAR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-01247-NONE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)