Opinion
Civil Action 14-593
10-05-2023
BRITTNEY MILLS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of October 2023, upon review of Defendant Michael Alice, Timothy Dunne, Thomas Liciardello, and John Speiser's Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF 66, 68, 69), Plaintiff Brittney Mills's Responses (ECF 74, 93, 95), and Defendants' Replies (ECF 80, 82, 96), and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of Court shall STRIKE Plaintiffs non-complaint filing docketed at ECF 92;
2. Defendant Alice's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 66) is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in his favor and against Mills with respect to all counts against Alice;
3. Defendant Liciardello and Speiser's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 69) is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Liciardello and Speiser and against Mills with respect to all counts against Liciardello and Speiser; and
4. The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants the City of Philadelphia and Officer Dunne (ECF 68) is GRANTED only to the extent that it seeks summary judgment on Dunne's behalf. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Dunne and against Mills with respect to all counts against Dunne.
Still remaining for decision in this matter are the City's Motion to Preclude the Testimony and Report of Plaintiff s Expert Shaun T. Santos (ECF 70), and, to the extent that it pertains to the City, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of the City and Dunne (ECF 68).