Opinion
NO. 1-10-0015.
January 5, 2011
ORDER
Following entry of the Court's Order (Docket No. 108), which adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 105), the Court received Plaintiff's Objections (Docket No. 110) to that Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections, and the file and finds nothing to change its prior ruling. Even accepting the Plaintiff's allegations as true and construing the Complaint liberally in favor of the pro se Plaintiff, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a constitutional violation against Defendants herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.