From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MILLER/PERRY v. NORRIS

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Aug 12, 2010
1:10-cv-00033-BSM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

1:10-cv-00033-BSM-JJV.

August 12, 2010


ORDER


The court has reviewed the recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff France Renee Miller/Perry's objections. After carefully reviewing the recommended disposition, Miller/Perry's objections, and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects in its entirety.

Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice and all pending motions are denied as moot. Further, it is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that this dismissal constitutes a "strike" and that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

MILLER/PERRY v. NORRIS

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Aug 12, 2010
1:10-cv-00033-BSM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

MILLER/PERRY v. NORRIS

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES RENEE MILLER/PERRY, PLAINTIFF ADC# 708998 v. LARRY NORRIS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

1:10-cv-00033-BSM-JJV (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Bank of Am.

Rule 8(a) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifies that a complaint must contain a "short…