Miller v. Woodford

Full title: GERALD LEE MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. JANE WOODFORD, WARDEN FELKER, ET…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

2:07-cv-01646 LKK EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

2:07-cv-01646 LKK EFB (PC)

07-11-2012

GERALD LEE MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. JANE WOODFORD, WARDEN FELKER, ET AL., Defendants.

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061 Supervising Deputy Attorney General JILL SCALLY, State Bar No. 161513 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Attorneys for J. Huckabee , G. James, M.D., L. Dial, M.D., and G. Castro WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATE Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Lakeysia R. Beene, CSB #265078 Attorneys for defendant Roger Cox, M.D.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JILL SCALLY, State Bar No. 161513

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Attorneys for J. Huckabee , G. James,

M.D., L. Dial, M.D., and G. Castro

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATE

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Lakeysia R. Beene, CSB #265078

Attorneys for defendant Roger Cox, M.D.

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF

DEFENDANTS JAMES, DIAL AND COX

WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice of Defendants James, Dial and Cox pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Each party shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees and in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT