From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 14, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1646 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1646 LKK EFB P.

July 14, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 1, 2010 request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Miller v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 14, 2010
No. CIV S-07-1646 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Miller v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:GERALD L. MILLER, JR., Plaintiff, v. JANE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1646 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2010)