From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Warden, S. Cent. Reg'l Jail

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Apr 14, 2022
Civil Action 2:20-cv-00645 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:20-cv-00645

04-14-2022

ANDREW MILLER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, South Central Regional Jail, Defendant.


ORDER

John T. Copenhaver, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

This action was previously referred to Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted on February 28, 2022, his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). PF&R, ECF No. 5.

The court has reviewed the magistrate judge's PF&R. The magistrate judge explains “that, while incarcerated, Plaintiff has filed at least three federal civil actions that have been dismissed as being frivolous or malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and, thus, he qualifies for application of the three strikes provision contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).” Id. at 4. The magistrate judge further explains “that Plaintiff fails to state any credible facts that reasonably indicate that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury sufficient to warrant an exception to the [Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995] three strikes rule with respect to the claim in his complaint.” Id. Thus, the magistrate judge recommends as follows:

[I]t is respectfully recommended that the presiding District Judge deny Plaintiff's Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs and dismiss this civil action without prejudice.
Id. at 5 (citations and emphasis omitted). The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has not objected to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation be, and hereby is, adopted by the court and incorporated herein;

2. The plaintiff's civil action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be, and hereby is, denied; and

4. This action be, and hereby is, dismissed from the docket.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this order to all counsel of record, any unrepresented parties, and the United States Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Miller v. Warden, S. Cent. Reg'l Jail

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Apr 14, 2022
Civil Action 2:20-cv-00645 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Miller v. Warden, S. Cent. Reg'l Jail

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW MILLER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, South Central Regional Jail…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia

Date published: Apr 14, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:20-cv-00645 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 2022)