From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 22, 1961
14 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

September 22, 1961

Appeal from the Orleans Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with $25 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: The contract at issue was made in the County of Steuben and provided for its performance in that county. Defendant has shown that the convenience of material witnesses will be served by a trial in Steuben County whereas the affidavit of plaintiff's attorney which attempts to show that the convenience of other witnesses will be best served by a trial in Orleans County cannot be considered because it fails to meet the standard of proof required on a motion for change of venue. We believe that the ends of justice will be promoted and the convenience of witnesses served by changing the venue of this action to Steuben County and that Special Term's denial of defendant's motion was an improvident exercise of discretion.


Summaries of

Miller v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 22, 1961
14 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Miller v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD F. MILLER, Respondent, v. KENNETH WARD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Wolff v. Friedman

Thereafter, the defendants moved for a change of venue to Onondaga County, pursuant to CPLR 510 (3). We find…

Jansen v. Bernhang

Here, the movants' papers suffice to demonstrate that at least three prospective witnesses live in New York…