From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 2, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-55 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-55

02-02-2018

WILLIAM R. MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman

ORDER AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 26)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #26), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #26) is ADOPTED in full;

(2) Defendants' partial motion to dismiss (doc. #5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;

(3) Counts Three, Nine, and Ten of Plaintiffs' complaint are hereby DISMISSED; and

(4) Count One of Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED to the limited extent Plaintiffs contend that Defendants' creation of an escrow account violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), 12 U.S.C. § 2605.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 2-2-18

/s/_________

Walter H. Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Miller v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 2, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-55 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Miller v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 2, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-55 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2018)