From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Stop Shop Company, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Mar 1, 1999
1999 Ct. Sup. 3219 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)

Opinion

No. CV96 033 64 09

March 1, 1999


RULING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REARGUE DECISION AND OPEN JUDGMENT


The court has reviewed and reconsidered the evidence in response to the motion and further articulates as follows:

1. Contrary to the plaintiff's claim there was no evidence that the shopping carts were "rain soaked".

2. There was no evidence that the particular wet area which caused the plaintiff to slip was caused by the carts, the defendants employees or tracked in by customers.

3. Even if the floor was "damp" as described in the incident report, there is no evidence that this dampness was anything more than a "condition naturally productive of the defect even though subsequently in fact producing it." Fuller v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 38 Conn. App. 299, 301 (1995).

The motion to reargue and open the judgement is denied.

First National Supermarkets, Inc., 38 Conn. App. 299, 301 (1995).

The motion to reargue and open the judgment is denied.

THE COURT Mottolese, Judge.


Summaries of

Miller v. Stop Shop Company, Inc.

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport
Mar 1, 1999
1999 Ct. Sup. 3219 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)
Case details for

Miller v. Stop Shop Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR MILLER v. STOP AND SHOP COMPANY, INC

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport

Date published: Mar 1, 1999

Citations

1999 Ct. Sup. 3219 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)