Opinion
No. 05-06-01215-CR, 05-06-01216-CR, 05-06-01217-CR
Opinion Filed July 27, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-43965-LW, F05-43971-LW, F05-43966-LW.
Before Justices WRIGHT, RICHTER, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Marcus Leroy Miller of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (a firearm), unauthorized use of a vehicle, and evading arrest or detention while using a vehicle. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. `' 29.03, 31.07, 38.04 (Vernon 2003 Supp. 2006). In the aggravated robbery case, the jury assessed punishment at thirty years' imprisonment. In the unauthorized use of a vehicle and evading arrest cases, the trial court assessed punishment at two years' confinement in a State jail facility and an $800 fine. Appellant's attorney filed briefs in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefs present a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered copies of the briefs to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's briefs. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree these appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support these appeals. We note that in the evading arrest case, cause no. 05-06-01217-CR, the trial court's judgment recites the place of confinement as the "Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice." However, the trial court orally pronounced the sentence at two years in the State Jail Division. On our own motion, we modify the trial court's judgment to show the place of confinement is the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27-28 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529-30 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd). In cause nos. 05-06-01215-CR and 05-06-01216-CR, we affirm the trial court's judgments. In cause no. 05-06-01217-CR, we affirm the trial court's judgment as modified.