From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 27, 2002
809 So. 2d 101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D00-4856

Opinion filed February 27, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Wayne L. Cobb, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Barbara Ann Miller appeals her sentences for possession of cocaine and obstruction. Miller argues, and the State correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in failing to pronounce a special condition of probation. The order of probation contains special condition fifteen, which provides: "You must submit to a substance abuse evaluation, within thirty days, at your own expense, and follow all recommendations including individual and group counseling and support groups." The portion of probation condition fifteen requiring Miller to pay for a substance abuse evaluation is a special condition that must be orally pronounced at sentencing. See State v. Williams, 712 So.2d 762, 763 (Fla. 1998) (holding that the requirement that a defendant pay for drug testing is a special condition of probation that must be announced at sentencing). Therefore, we strike this portion of condition fifteen because it was not pronounced at sentencing. The remainder of condition fifteen is affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm Miller's judgments and sentences, but we strike a portion of probation condition fifteen.

GREEN, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur


Summaries of

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 27, 2002
809 So. 2d 101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA ANN MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 27, 2002

Citations

809 So. 2d 101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Ladson v. State

See State v. Williams, 712 So.2d 762, 763 (Fla. 1998). Such conditions have previously been stricken when…

Martinez v. State

The requirement that Martinez pay for testing is a special condition of probation that must be orally…