From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 2004
866 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-1230.

Opinion filed February 25, 2004.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 98-40881 and 98-41157.

Frank A. Abrams, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.


We have for review the denial by the trial court of Appellant's Rule 3.850 Motion for Post Conviction Relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied Miller's motion after an evidentiary hearing at which Appellant was afforded a full and fair opportunity to present evidence on his behalf and cross-examine his trial counsel. We find that the decision of the trial court to deny the motion was supported by competent substantial evidence. Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla. 1997).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 25, 2004
866 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY MILLER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 25, 2004

Citations

866 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)