From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 18, 2002
828 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-1771

Opinion filed October 18, 2002.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.


Barry E. Miller appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand on one of his claims because the trial court did not review the proper sentencing documents.

In claim one of his motion, Mr. Miller asserted that the sentences imposed in 2001, in case number 91-03887, were illegal. The trial court denied the claim, referring to 1995 sentences that had been set aside. Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to consider Mr. Miller's claim in light of the sentences imposed in 1996 and 2001.

Mr. Miller's other claims lack merit, and we affirm them. His claim for 120 days' of gain time is affirmed without prejudice to Mr. Miller's right to raise the claim through administrative channels of the Department of Corrections. If not satisfied by that ruling, Mr. Miller can petition for mandamus with the appropriate circuit court. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla.2d DCA 2000); Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla.2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 18, 2002
828 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:BARRY EDWARD MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 18, 2002

Citations

828 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Squires v. State

Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 828 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). ALTENBERND, C.J., and CASANUEVA and…

Shimko v. State

Affirmed. See § 775.082(9)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); McDonald v. State, 957 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 2007); Stovall v.…