From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 19, 2020
300 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-432

06-19-2020

Chrystal E. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Chrystal E. Miller, Florida City, pro se. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Chrystal E. Miller, Florida City, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Chrystal E. Miller's judgments and sentences. We remand, however, for the trial court to strike $6 in costs assessed pursuant to section 318.18(11)(b), Florida Statutes (2019), because Miller was not charged with a traffic infraction. See Sorenson v. State , 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

EVANDER, C.J., SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Miller v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 19, 2020
300 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRYSTAL E. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 19, 2020

Citations

300 So. 3d 325 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)