From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 3, 2019
275 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2D18-2818

05-03-2019

Adam Russell MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Adam Russell Miller, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Adam Russell Miller, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Adam Miller appeals his convictions and sentences after pleading to four counts of scheme to defraud over $ 50,000 and one count of scheme to defraud over $ 20,000. We affirm Miller's convictions and sentences without further comment. However, because the order of probation erroneously omits Miller's sentence on count three, we remand for the correction of the written probation order to conform to the oral pronouncement on count three. See Powell v. State, 223 So.3d 412, 414 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; Williams v. State, 604 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
May 3, 2019
275 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADAM RUSSELL MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 3, 2019

Citations

275 So. 3d 688 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)