From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 28, 1965
23 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

May 28, 1965


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. While we do not accept the trial court's theory (see City of Buffalo v. Pratt, 131 N.Y. 293; Matter of City of New York [ Northern Blvd.], 258 N.Y. 136, 152) there is no proof in this record of consequential damages and any finding of damage accruing after the expiration of the 17-year lease would have to be purely conjectural. We decide no other issue. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 28, 1965
23 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Miller v. State

Case Details

Full title:HARRY MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 28, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)