From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Sielinger

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02889-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-02889-JD

08-02-2023

ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Petitioner, v. R. SIELINGER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a habeas petition. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and petitioner has not paid the fee, filed a complete application to proceed IFP or otherwise communicated with the Court. The case is dismissed without prejudice. A certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Sielinger

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 2, 2023
23-cv-02889-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Sielinger

Case Details

Full title:ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Petitioner, v. R. SIELINGER, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 2, 2023

Citations

23-cv-02889-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2023)