From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 31, 2013
73 A.3d 523 (Pa. 2013)

Opinion

2013-07-31

David MILLER and I26 Hotel Corporation, Petitioners v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Respondent.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, No. 236 MAL 2013.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED

TO

the issue set forth below. The issue, as stated by petitioners:

Did the Commonwealth Court's decision conflict with decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court where it affirmed the lower court's order granting [respondent] SEPTA's Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that Congress intended to preempt state law claims of negligent railroad bridge construction and interference with riparian rights when it enacted the Federal Railroad Safety Act?

Petitioner's Application for Leave to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 31, 2013
73 A.3d 523 (Pa. 2013)
Case details for

Miller v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:David MILLER and I26 Hotel Corporation, Petitioners v. SOUTHEASTERN…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

73 A.3d 523 (Pa. 2013)