From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Schrader

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Sep 2, 2010
CAUSE NO.: 1:08-cv-189 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 1:08-cv-189.

September 2, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Intervene, apparently under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), by JC Flegal, LLC, Douglas A. Flegal, and Thomas D. Flegal. (Docket # 148.) The Movants claim that they have received a judgment against Plaintiff Kent A. Miller in state court and that their interests will be impaired if they are unable to intervene.

However, a "mere economic interest" does not allow a party to intervene as of right. Flying J, Inc. v. J.B. van Hollen, 578 F.3d 569, 572 (7th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases). See also Thompson v. United States, ___ F.R.D. ___, 2010 WL 2573884, at *2-3 (N.D. Ill. June 25, 2010) (discussing van Hollen and denying a creditor's attempt to intervene and collect judgment).

Accordingly, this motion is set for a hearing on September 22, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for the Movants is to be present in person and all other counsel may participate by telephone. The Movants are to file a brief in support of their motion, specifically addressing van Hollen and Thompson, on or before September 15, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

Enter for September 2, 2010.


Summaries of

Miller v. Schrader

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Sep 2, 2010
CAUSE NO.: 1:08-cv-189 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Miller v. Schrader

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE NICOLE MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL P. SCHRADER, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 1:08-cv-189 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 2, 2010)