From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Rossiter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 7, 1925
125 Misc. 80 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)

Opinion

May 7, 1925.

McLaughlin Stern [ Martin Lippman of counsel], for the appellant.

White Case [ Chester Bordeau of counsel], for the respondent.


The action was for brokerage commission earned in procuring a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy on defendant's terms. A contract of sale was entered into. Immediately thereafter the broker made an agreement to wait for the payment of his commission "when, as and if title closes." Objections were made to the title and by mutual agreement the contract was rescinded; the money paid on account returned to the purchaser and the defendants paid the expenses incurred by the purchaser.

The brokerage commission, in this case, was earned when the contract was entered into. The agreement made by the broker was without consideration and unenforcible. ( Reis Co. v. Zimmerli, 224 N.Y. 351.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, GUY, WASSERVOGEL and GLENNON, JJ.


Summaries of

Miller v. Rossiter

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 7, 1925
125 Misc. 80 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
Case details for

Miller v. Rossiter

Case Details

Full title:GOLDYE MILLER, Appellant, v . ALFRED ROSSITER and BANKERS' TRUST COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1925

Citations

125 Misc. 80 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
209 N.Y.S. 707

Citing Cases

Wells Construction Co. v. Goder Incinerator Co.

That is this case. At the outset of such an inquiry as this there must be kept in mind the admonition of…

California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. Mason By-Products Co.

The contention of the plaintiff in error that there was a contract from the beginning, or from the receipt of…