From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Prince

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 29, 2014
Appellate case number: 01-13-00243-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-13-00243-CV Trial court case number: 2011-65843

04-29-2014

Paula Miller v. James Prince a.k.a James Smith


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

On April 3, 2014, appellant filed a suggestion of bankruptcy stating that her bankruptcy petition was reinstated on March 28, 2014. However, because the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362 only stays actions against a debtor, we issued an order on April 22, 2014 holding that this appeal was not stayed because appellant's suggestion of bankruptcy failed to demonstrate that the appeal—which arises from a divorce proceeding initiated by appellant—involves an action against the appellant. See Budzyn v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., No. 01-08-00211-CV, 2010 WL 2044628, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] May, 19, 2010, no pet.); Greenberg v. Fincher & Son Real Estate, Inc., 753 S.W.2d 506, 506-07 (Tex. App.—Houston [1 Dist.]1988, no pet.); Three Legged Monkey, L.P. v. Cook, 417 S.W.3d 541, 543 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2013, petition for review filed); Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. Denton County Appraisal Dist., 13 S.W.3d 828, 829-830 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, pet. denied). Our order requested that appellant either file her brief or a response demonstrating the applicability of the Section 362 stay. On April 23, 2014, appellant filed a response, in the form of a motion for rehearing en banc, clarifying that attorney's fees and sanctions were awarded against appellant in the underlying case.

Upon consideration of appellant's response, it is ORDERED that this appeal is stayed until a party notifies the Court that reinstatement is authorized by federal law or by the bankruptcy court and moves to reinstate the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2, 8.3(a). If the bankruptcy court lifts or terminates the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion to reinstate. See TEX. R. APP. P 8.3(a). Unless a party successfully moves to reinstate, this appeal will remain an inactive case on the Court's docket.

Appellant is ORDERED to provide this Court with an update on the bankruptcy proceedings within 6 months of the date of this order, and each 6 months thereafter.

Appellant's motion for rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot.

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: Jane Bland

[×] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court


Summaries of

Miller v. Prince

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Apr 29, 2014
Appellate case number: 01-13-00243-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Miller v. Prince

Case Details

Full title:Paula Miller v. James Prince a.k.a James Smith

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Apr 29, 2014

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-13-00243-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 29, 2014)