From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Pierce

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 15, 2007
229 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7209.

Submitted: May 30, 2007.

Decided: June 15, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:99-cv-00050).

James Edward Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Mason Thomas, Patrick, Harper Dixon, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Edward Miller appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint upon remand from this court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Pierce, No. 5:99-cv-00050 (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Pierce

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 15, 2007
229 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Miller v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:James Edward MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike PIERCE; David Pendry…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2007

Citations

229 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2007)