From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Apr 18, 1938
78 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1938)

Opinion

No. 14,247.

Decided April 18, 1938.

Plaintiff in error was found guilty of contributing to juvenile delinquency.

Reversed.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Actions — Confession of Error — Judgment. Review in the Supreme Court by writ of error of a judgment of conviction under a charge of contributing to juvenile delinquency is a civil proceeding; assignments of error with confession thereof by the opposing party amounts to a stipulation under which the judgment of the lower court may be summarily reversed.

Error to the County Court of Pueblo County, Hon. Hubert Glover, Judge.

Mr. V. G. SEAVY, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. BYRON G. ROGERS, Attorney General, Mr. REID WILLIAMS, Assistant, for the people.


THESE parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court where Alex H. Miller was joined with plaintiff in error. They are hereinafter referred to as defendants.

One Ruth Park, a probation officer of Pueblo county, filed a petition against defendants alleging that they "encouraged, caused and contributed to the delinquency" of said Verna Edwin and Helen Hendrickson, minor girls. This defendant was tried to a jury of six, which found her "guilty * * * as charged in the petition" and the court thereupon sentenced her to one year in the county jail. To review that judgment this writ is prosecuted.

At every proper stage of the proceedings defendant duly objected on the grounds that the charge should have been brought by information filed by the district attorney and that defendant was entitled to a trial by a jury of twelve. Those objections were overruled and those rulings are assigned as error. As to each the Attorney General says, "In this we think she is correct." He bases this confession of error on the ground that the action is brought under section 67, chapter 33, '35 C. S. A., and that this is a criminal statute. The present action, as it appears here, is civil, and these assignments, plus the confessions, are equivalent to a stipulation.

The judgment is accordingly reversed.

MR. JUSTICE HILLIARD, MR. JUSTICE YOUNG and MR. JUSTICE BAKKE concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Apr 18, 1938
78 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1938)
Case details for

Miller v. People

Case Details

Full title:MILLER v. THE PEOPLE IN THE INTEREST OF VERNA EDWIN AND HELEN HENDRICKSON

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1938

Citations

78 P.2d 624 (Colo. 1938)
78 P.2d 624

Citing Cases

Interest of M.N

It is the duty and role of the district attorney, not the judge, to decide whether justice requires that a…

Interest of J.A.L

B. As we pointed out in M.N., a judge does not have the power to charge an individual with violation of a…