Opinion
1:10CV917.
February 1, 2011
ORDER
On December 20, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 4 and 5.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by section 636. (Doc. 6.)
The court has reviewed those portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination. The court finds that Plaintiff's objections do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings, which are affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failing to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), without prejudice to re-filing.
February 1, 2011