Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Miller v. Mt. Laurel Chalets

88 S.W.3d 927 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Miller v. Mt. Laurel Chalets

1 Citing case

  1. Bridges v. Bridges

    168 S.W.3d 154 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 3 times

    The issue of the defendants' duty to Wilson hinges on the foreseeability of harm to someone in the plaintiff's position. In Miller v. Mt. Laurel Chalets, Inc., 88 S.W.3d 927 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2002), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 2002), the plaintiff sued the owner of rental property.