Opinion
2:11-cv-00987-GMN-CWH
08-29-2011
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan (#31). The Court has reviewed the proposal and finds that it is premature. A discovery plan should not be submitted until after the parties have held a Rule 26(f) conference - which has not happened here. See Local Rule 26-1(d). Plaintiff's proposed plan also fails to identify any of the discovery deadlines identified in Local Rule 26-1(e). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Proposed Discovery Plan (#31) is denied.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge