From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1942
21 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. 1942)

Opinion

(Filed 30 September, 1942.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Sink, J., at April Term, 1942, of RUTHERFORD. Affirmed.

Boucher Boucher, Stover Dunagan, and Chas. F. Gold, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.

Hamrick Hamrick for defendant, appellee.


The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile by his representative and agent.

The Court is unable to find any substantial difference between the evidence in the instant case and that upon which a judgment as of nonsuit was sustained in the case of Smith v. Moore, 220 N.C. 165 — a case growing out of the same accident, to which the plaintiff in that case and the plaintiff in this have identical relation. The judgment of nonsuit upon the evidence in this case must be sustained on that authority.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Miller v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1942
21 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. 1942)
Case details for

Miller v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:MARY MILLER v. BERT MOORE, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS MOORE AUTO SALES

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1942

Citations

21 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. 1942)
21 S.E.2d 876

Citing Cases

Carter v. Motor Lines

Even more significant is the fact that we, time and again, have either sustained or directed a judgment of…