From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1985
466 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Summary

reiterating that a trial court may include a reasonable amount for medical insurance premiums as part of an alimony award (citing Inglett v. Inglett, 439 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) ; Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So.2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) ; Blass v. Blass, 316 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) )

Summary of this case from Lostaglio v. Lostaglio

Opinion

No. 83-1264.

March 7, 1985. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, C. Vernon Mize, Jr., J.

W. Marvin Hardy, III, of Gurney Handley, P.A., Orlando, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Dwight W. Severs of Crofton, Holland, Starling, Harris Severs, P.A., Titusville, for appellee/cross-appellant.


The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which distributed the parties' property and awarded her permanent alimony. The husband cross appeals.

With the exception of the insurance question discussed below, we do not find the court abused its discretion. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203 (Fla. 1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

Under the judgment, the husband must pay for his wife's medical insurance and for medical and dental costs she may incur which are not covered by insurance. It is well established that a trial court, in its discretion, may order a former husband to pay a reasonable amount for medical insurance premiums for the wife as part of an alimony award. Inglett v. Inglett, 439 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So.2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Blass v. Blass, 316 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The husband does not argue that he is unable to obtain medical insurance at a reasonable cost, rather he claims that the requirement that he pay all of the wife's medical and dental costs not covered by insurance and regardless of amount, is error since one extended illness could wipe him out financially. We agree and remand to the trial court to determine his maximum liability in this regard. Jordan v. Jordan, 389 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See generally, Thompson v. Thompson, 325 So.2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1985
466 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

reiterating that a trial court may include a reasonable amount for medical insurance premiums as part of an alimony award (citing Inglett v. Inglett, 439 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) ; Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So.2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) ; Blass v. Blass, 316 So.2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) )

Summary of this case from Lostaglio v. Lostaglio

In Miller the appellate court held it was error for the trial court to require that the husband "pay all of the wife's medical and dental costs not covered by insurance and regardless of amount... since one extended illness could wipe him out financially."

Summary of this case from Schiffhauer v. Schiffhauer
Case details for

Miller v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE Y. MILLER, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. CLAUDE W. MILLER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 9, 1985

Citations

466 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Szemborski v. Szemborski

However, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in failing to set an amount which the former…

Schiffhauer v. Schiffhauer

The trial court however required that the husband pay her reasonable future medical expenses only for the…