From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Miller

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 3, 2022
No. CV-22-00071-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

CV-22-00071-TUC-JGZ

10-03-2022

Russell Miller and Lisa Miller, Plaintiffs, v. Scott A. Miller and Robin G. Frye-Miller, Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps United States District Judge

On August 26, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Amend Complaint. (Doc. 44.) Defendants filed no response in objection. Courts should freely give leave to amend when justice so requires. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2). The Court finds that the Plaintiffs' amended complaint was filed in good faith, does not result in undue delay, and is not futile. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). The Court will thus grant Plaintiffs Motion.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend (Doc. 44) is GRANTED.

2. Defendants shall answer the amended complaint or file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days from the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Miller v. Miller

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 3, 2022
No. CV-22-00071-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Miller v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:Russell Miller and Lisa Miller, Plaintiffs, v. Scott A. Miller and Robin…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

No. CV-22-00071-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Oct. 3, 2022)