From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Miller

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2021
Case No. 2D20-588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2D20-588

04-30-2021

RICHARD E. MILLER, Appellant, v. AMY D. MILLER, Appellee.

Richard E. Miller, pro se. Christopher A. Tancredo of The Tancredo Law Firm, P.A., Plant City, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Wesley D. Tibbals, Judge. Richard E. Miller, pro se. Christopher A. Tancredo of The Tancredo Law Firm, P.A., Plant City, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KHOUZAM, C.J., and MORRIS and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Miller v. Miller

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2021
Case No. 2D20-588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Miller v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. MILLER, Appellant, v. AMY D. MILLER, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 30, 2021

Citations

Case No. 2D20-588 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2021)