Miller v. Miller

Full title: Matthew M. MILLER, Respondent, v. Susan M. MILLER, Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

589 S.W.3d 660 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107638

11-12-2019

Matthew M. MILLER, Respondent, v. Susan M. MILLER, Appellant.

Susan K. Roach, William E. Roussin, Co-Counsel, 11628 Old Ballas Rd, Suite 116, St. Louis, MO. 63141, for appellant. Jenna R. Conley, Cherlyn M. Crosby-Herberts, 814 1 Capitol Drive, St. Charles, Mo. 63301, 504 First Capitol Drive, Suite 2, St. Charles, Mo. 63301, for respondent. Nicolette A. Klapp, 230 South Bemiston Ave, Suite 1400, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, guardian ad litem.

PER CURIAM.

Susan K. Roach, William E. Roussin, Co-Counsel, 11628 Old Ballas Rd, Suite 116, St. Louis, MO. 63141, for appellant.

Jenna R. Conley, Cherlyn M. Crosby-Herberts, 814 1^ST Capitol Drive, St. Charles, Mo. 63301, 504 First Capitol Drive, Suite 2, St. Charles, Mo. 63301, for respondent.

Nicolette A. Klapp, 230 South Bemiston Ave, Suite 1400, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, guardian ad litem.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Mother, Susan Miller, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County modifying the parties' decree of dissolution by, inter alia , awarding sole legal and physical custody of the parties' two minor children to Father, Matthew Miller, and denying Mother’s motion for contempt against Father. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(1).