From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Meda

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
1:22-cv-00264-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00264-JLT-HBK (PC)

06-10-2022

NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JANET MEDA, ET. AL., Defendants.


ORDER TO DISMISS (DOC. 10)

On April 25, 2022, the Court found, based upon the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations, that Plaintiff is a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff's complaint did not contain sufficient facts alleging imminent danger of serious physical harm. (Doc. 10). Plaintiff was directed to pay the full filing fee within thirty days and was warned that failure to timely pay would result in summary dismissal of the case. (Id. at 2.) As of the date on this order, Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee and the time to do so has expired. (See docket.)

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of court shall terminate any pending motions, enter judgment accordingly, and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Meda

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
1:22-cv-00264-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Miller v. Meda

Case Details

Full title:NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Plaintiff, v. JANET MEDA, ET. AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00264-JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)