From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Lusk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 3, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03365-RBJ-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03365-RBJ-BNB

02-03-2014

DANIEL BRENT MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CORPERAL LUSK, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY BAST, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY ODELL, Teller Sheriff, and DEPUTY MARTINEZ, Teller Sheriff, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the ORDER [Doc. No. 145] of Judge R. Brooke Jackson entered on Jan. 29, 2014, APPROVING and ADOPTING the magistrate judge's recommendation that the action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the plaintiff's failure to comply with orders of the court, it is

ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants LUSK, BAST, ODELL and MARTINEZ and against Plaintiff DANIEL BRENT MILLER, who recovers nothing, and the action is dismissed on the merits. Defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days' entry of judgment.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 3rd day of February, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: __________

Julie Dynes, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Miller v. Lusk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 3, 2014
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03365-RBJ-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Miller v. Lusk

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BRENT MILLER, Plaintiff, v. CORPERAL LUSK, Teller Sheriff, DEPUTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 3, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03365-RBJ-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2014)