From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Long Drugs DBA CVS Health

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 18, 2023
2:22-cv-01150-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 18, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01150-JAD-VCF

04-18-2023

MICHELE DANISE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LONG DRUGS DBA CVS HEALTH, et al., Defendant

ETHAN D. THOMAS Bar No. 12874 ANDREW S. CLARK Bar No. 14854 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant CAREMARK, L.L.C. Tye S. Hanseen, Esq. Nicholas Crosby, Esq. Reagan Weber, Esq. William Reese Levins, Esq. MARQUIS AURBACH Attorneys for Plaintiff, MICHELE DANISE MILLER Ethan D. Thomas, Esq. Andrew S. Clark, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant, CAREMARK, L.L.C.


ETHAN D. THOMAS Bar No. 12874 ANDREW S. CLARK Bar No. 14854 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant CAREMARK, L.L.C.

Tye S. Hanseen, Esq. Nicholas Crosby, Esq. Reagan Weber, Esq. William Reese Levins, Esq. MARQUIS AURBACH Attorneys for Plaintiff, MICHELE DANISE MILLER

Ethan D. Thomas, Esq. Andrew S. Clark, Esq. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant, CAREMARK, L.L.C.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST]

Plaintiff, Michelle Danise Miller ("Ms. Miller"), and Defendant, Caremark, L.L.C. (incorrectly named in the Amended Complaint as Long Drugs DBA CVS Health) (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”), hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file a response to the Amended Complaint from the current deadline of April 19, 2023, up to and including May 19, 2023.

This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. The requested extension is necessary as the parties are currently conferring regarding Defendant's contention that Ms. Miller's claims are subject to a valid arbitration agreement. The additional time will allow the parties to review the relevant documents and determine whether a stipulation to dismiss and arbitrate this case is appropriate. To the extent a stipulation is possible, it would obviate the need for filing a response to the Complaint in Court.

This is the second request for an extension of time to respond to the Amended Complaint and is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Miller v. Long Drugs DBA CVS Health

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 18, 2023
2:22-cv-01150-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Miller v. Long Drugs DBA CVS Health

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE DANISE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. LONG DRUGS DBA CVS HEALTH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 18, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01150-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Apr. 18, 2023)