From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Lichtenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1942
265 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

December 22, 1942.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.


Consolidated action to recover damages sustained as the result of an automobile collision. Judgment in favor of respondent Jack Miller for property damage, and in favor of the respondents Ethel Miller, Edward Stampf and Mary Stampf for damages for personal injuries, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Miller v. Lichtenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1942
265 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Miller v. Lichtenfeld

Case Details

Full title:JACK MILLER et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE LICHTENFELD, Appellant. GEORGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)