From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 18, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-CV-51 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-CV-51

04-18-2018

GARY ADAM MILLER, Petitioner v. MARIROSA LAMAS, et al., Respondents


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2018, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 89) of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending that the court deny the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by petitioner Gary Adam Miller ("Miller"), wherein Judge Carlson opines that Miller's petition fails on its merits, (see Doc. 89 at 24-34), and the court noting that Miller filed an objection (Doc. 97) to the report, and following de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court being in full agreement with Judge Carlson's rationale, and finding same to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and finding Miller's objection, which raises arguments identical to those raised before and rejected by the magistrate judge, to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 89) of Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. Miller's petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. The court finds no basis to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 11(a).

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Miller v. Lamas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 18, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-CV-51 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2018)
Case details for

Miller v. Lamas

Case Details

Full title:GARY ADAM MILLER, Petitioner v. MARIROSA LAMAS, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:10-CV-51 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2018)