Opinion
Case Number 17-11006
02-19-2020
TONY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. PAUL KLEE, NICKOLAS LESLIE, HERB BRIGHTON, STEPHEN YOUNG, and BRENT, Defendants.
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Presently before the Court is the report issued on January 27, 2020 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismiss the plaintiff's claims against all of the named defendants, except for the First Amendment claim against Paul Klee. Although the magistrate judge's report stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 78) is ADOPTED, and the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED IN PART. All of the plaintiff's claims against defendants Nickolas Leslie, Herb Brighton, Stephen Young, and Brent are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The defendants' motion is DENIED in all other respects.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge Date: February 19, 2020
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first-class U.S. mail on September 25, 2019.
s/Susan K. Pinkowski
SUSAN K. PINKOWSKI