From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2018
Case Number 17-11006 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case Number 17-11006

03-15-2018

TONY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. PAUL KLEE, NICKOLAS LESLIE, HERB BRIGHTON, STEPHEN YOUNG, and OFFICER BRENT, Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the report issued on February 23, 2018 by Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the defendants' motions for summary judgment. The magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report. However, no objections have been filed, and the time for filing them has lapsed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [35] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendants' motions for summary judgment [22, 24] are DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the referral of the matter to the magistrate judge for general case management [11] is CONTINUED.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge Dated: March 15, 2018

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on March 15, 2018.

s/Susan Pinkowski

SUSAN PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Miller v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2018
Case Number 17-11006 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Miller v. Klee

Case Details

Full title:TONY MILLER, Plaintiff, v. PAUL KLEE, NICKOLAS LESLIE, HERB BRIGHTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 15, 2018

Citations

Case Number 17-11006 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 15, 2018)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Pynnonen

And, if Internal Affairs had conducted an investigation, then Jackson's claim would have been exhausted. See…

Billiter v. Aufdemkampe

And a reasonable juror could conclude that Plaintiff was in a lose-lose situation, and consequently, did not…